Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley appears by her choice to reject a ballot proposition to repeal the state’s 2011 casino law. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losings across the state, however they’ve always made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the highest court in Massachusetts will give them one last opportunity to place the problem before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments week that is last the concern of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can show up on the statewide ballot in November. The move would create a referendum essentially on whether gambling enterprises could be built the one that could disrupt the method also if it absolutely was to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Is Violated By Repeal
That disruption ended up being one associated with the main arguments made by attorneys for the state, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, whom rejected the petition because she felt it was unconstitutional. According to Coakley, such a repeal would cause damage to the ‘implied agreements’ between casino license applicants and the state gambling payment. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally taken away without any compensation for the casino businesses.
Coakley made remarks at a Continue reading